Embracing what the Resurrection Means

Summary of my sermon, based on Luke 24:1-12. Preached at Greenhills Christian Fellowship Toronto on Resurrection Sunday – April 5, 2026.

Every Easter, believers across the globe—from our local congregations to those gathering in Honduras, and even the persecuted church operating in secret—declare the exact same truth: He is risen. Yet, year after year, skeptics and cable television documentaries attempt to explain away the empty tomb with naturalistic theories. One of the most persistent is the “swoon theory,” which suggests Jesus did not actually die on the cross but merely passed out, only to revive later in the cool of the tomb. Historically and medically, this is an absurd proposition. The Romans were professional executioners. Under Roman law, a guard who failed to carry out an execution was subject to “vicarious liability”—meaning they would suffer the execution themselves. The soldiers ensuring Jesus was dead were highly motivated to get it right.

The crucifixion is an established historical reality. What is truly in dispute for the skeptic is what happened on Sunday morning. When we examine Luke’s account of the resurrection, we have to ask a critical question: Is this just a “believable” story crafted to start a religion, or is it a record of something real?

If a first-century author were fabricating a story and trying to make it believable to a Greco-Roman or Jewish audience, they would have left out specific details that Luke actively includes. By looking at these “embarrassing” details, we see the absolute authenticity of the gospel narrative.


Detail 1: The First Witnesses Were Women

Luke 24 tells us that the first people to discover the empty tomb and receive the angelic message were women—specifically Mary Magdalene, Joanna, and Mary the mother of James.

If you were inventing a story in the first century and wanted people to believe it, this is the absolute last detail you would include. In ancient patriarchal societies, women were treated as second-class citizens. Their testimony was generally considered invalid in a court of law. The first-century Jewish historian Josephus specifically wrote that the testimony of women should not be admitted due to the “levity and boldness of their sex.”

To make matters worse for the story’s cultural credibility, Luke specifically names Mary Magdalene. Luke 8 tells us that Jesus had previously cast seven demons out of her, meaning she would have been viewed as a complete social outcast. If Luke were trying to craft a culturally acceptable, easily believable myth, he would have written that esteemed male leaders discovered the tomb. Instead, he wrote the truth exactly as it happened, regardless of the cultural stigma.

Detail 2: The Unbelief of the Disciples

When the angels speak to the women at the tomb, they say, “Remember how he told you… that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men and be crucified and on the third day rise.” The fact that they had to be reminded shows that the followers of Jesus had completely forgotten or misunderstood His teachings.

Furthermore, when the women run back to tell the eleven apostles what they saw, Luke writes, “But these words seemed to them an idle tale, and they did not believe them” (Luke 24:11). The Greek word used here for “idle tale” is leros, which translates to pure nonsense or utter garbage. The men who would become the foundational leaders of the Christian church initially treated the news of the resurrection as fake news.

Throughout the gospels, the disciples are repeatedly portrayed as dense, fearful, and lacking faith. Peter rebukes Jesus for predicting His death, and later denies Him three times. If you were inventing a religion, you would not portray your founding leaders as bumbling, skeptical cowards. Luke includes their stubborn unbelief because he is recording history, not writing propaganda.

The Power of the Empty Tomb

So, what changed? What transformed these fearful, skeptical men who hid behind locked doors into bold preachers willing to be executed for their faith?

They saw the empty tomb. They witnessed the risen Christ.

In Acts 3, Peter—the same man who thought the women’s report was pure nonsense—stands boldly before a hostile crowd and declares, “You killed the author of life, whom God raised from the dead. To this we are witnesses.”

The resurrection changed them, and it changes us. As the Apostle Paul writes in Ephesians 1, the exact same immeasurable power that God used to raise Christ from the dead is currently at work in those who believe. This is why we can confidently declare alongside the Apostle Paul in Galatians 2:20 that we have been crucified with Christ. Claiming to die with a convicted criminal only makes sense if the tomb is empty. Because He lives, we live by faith in the Son of God who loved us and gave Himself for us.

Responding to God’s Presence and Revelation

Summary of my sermon, based on Luke 11:24-36. Preached at Greenhills Christian Fellowship Toronto on Resurrection Sunday – April 20, 2025.

Despite all the miracles Jesus performed—like casting out demons—there were still some who accused him of working with Satan, or Beelzebul. Others weren’t satisfied and kept asking for more signs to prove he was the Messiah. These responses mirror what we see in our world today. Some people see Jesus as just one of many spiritual options. Others want to believe—but only on their own terms, when their personal standards of “proof” are met. But Jesus addresses both responses with clarity and boldness, especially when he talks about the “sign of Jonah.”

Jesus makes it clear that this generation’s demand for signs is evil. They weren’t seeking the truth—they were shifting the goalposts, never satisfied. So he gives them one sign and one sign only: the sign of Jonah. Just as Jonah spent three days in the belly of a great fish before being spit back out, Jesus would be buried for three days before rising again. This, he says, is the ultimate sign that he is who he claims to be.

And of course, we know what happened. Jesus was crucified, buried, and on the third day, he rose again. That’s the heart of the Gospel we celebrate on Resurrection Sunday. That’s the sign he gave—a supernatural event that no amount of skeptical reasoning can erase. And yet, the world still tries. From the earliest days, people have come up with alternative theories: maybe Jesus’ body was stolen, maybe it was a mass hallucination, maybe he never really died. But none of those explanations hold up. Roman soldiers knew how to execute. Hallucinations don’t appear to 500 people at once. And no one dies for something they know is a lie—yet that’s what happened to many of Jesus’ followers.

So what’s really going on with these objections? It’s not about evidence. It’s about the heart. People reject the resurrection not because it’s unbelievable, but because they don’t want to believe. And that’s why Jesus brings up the Queen of Sheba and the people of Nineveh. They responded to far less than what Jesus offered. The Queen of Sheba traveled great distances just to hear Solomon’s wisdom—and ended up praising Yahweh. The Ninevites repented at Jonah’s preaching, even though Jonah was reluctant and flawed. And yet Jesus, who is greater than Solomon and Jonah, stood before them—and they refused him.

So Jesus draws the line. He is the light, and his message is like a lamp. It’s not meant to be hidden—it’s meant to shine, to give light to all who will receive it. And those who open their eyes to that light will be full of it—full of truth, full of life. But those who keep their eyes shut, who refuse to believe unless every demand is met, will remain in darkness.

This is where Jesus lands the point. Be careful that the light in you isn’t actually darkness. The resurrection isn’t just a nice idea or a hopeful story—it’s the sign. The one sign we’re given. And the proper response isn’t more demands, more debate, more delay. The proper response is faith. Receive the message. Accept the light. And let it fill you.