Embracing what the Resurrection Means

Summary of my sermon, based on Luke 24:1-12. Preached at Greenhills Christian Fellowship Toronto on Resurrection Sunday – April 5, 2026.

Every Easter, believers across the globe—from our local congregations to those gathering in Honduras, and even the persecuted church operating in secret—declare the exact same truth: He is risen. Yet, year after year, skeptics and cable television documentaries attempt to explain away the empty tomb with naturalistic theories. One of the most persistent is the “swoon theory,” which suggests Jesus did not actually die on the cross but merely passed out, only to revive later in the cool of the tomb. Historically and medically, this is an absurd proposition. The Romans were professional executioners. Under Roman law, a guard who failed to carry out an execution was subject to “vicarious liability”—meaning they would suffer the execution themselves. The soldiers ensuring Jesus was dead were highly motivated to get it right.

The crucifixion is an established historical reality. What is truly in dispute for the skeptic is what happened on Sunday morning. When we examine Luke’s account of the resurrection, we have to ask a critical question: Is this just a “believable” story crafted to start a religion, or is it a record of something real?

If a first-century author were fabricating a story and trying to make it believable to a Greco-Roman or Jewish audience, they would have left out specific details that Luke actively includes. By looking at these “embarrassing” details, we see the absolute authenticity of the gospel narrative.


Detail 1: The First Witnesses Were Women

Luke 24 tells us that the first people to discover the empty tomb and receive the angelic message were women—specifically Mary Magdalene, Joanna, and Mary the mother of James.

If you were inventing a story in the first century and wanted people to believe it, this is the absolute last detail you would include. In ancient patriarchal societies, women were treated as second-class citizens. Their testimony was generally considered invalid in a court of law. The first-century Jewish historian Josephus specifically wrote that the testimony of women should not be admitted due to the “levity and boldness of their sex.”

To make matters worse for the story’s cultural credibility, Luke specifically names Mary Magdalene. Luke 8 tells us that Jesus had previously cast seven demons out of her, meaning she would have been viewed as a complete social outcast. If Luke were trying to craft a culturally acceptable, easily believable myth, he would have written that esteemed male leaders discovered the tomb. Instead, he wrote the truth exactly as it happened, regardless of the cultural stigma.

Detail 2: The Unbelief of the Disciples

When the angels speak to the women at the tomb, they say, “Remember how he told you… that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men and be crucified and on the third day rise.” The fact that they had to be reminded shows that the followers of Jesus had completely forgotten or misunderstood His teachings.

Furthermore, when the women run back to tell the eleven apostles what they saw, Luke writes, “But these words seemed to them an idle tale, and they did not believe them” (Luke 24:11). The Greek word used here for “idle tale” is leros, which translates to pure nonsense or utter garbage. The men who would become the foundational leaders of the Christian church initially treated the news of the resurrection as fake news.

Throughout the gospels, the disciples are repeatedly portrayed as dense, fearful, and lacking faith. Peter rebukes Jesus for predicting His death, and later denies Him three times. If you were inventing a religion, you would not portray your founding leaders as bumbling, skeptical cowards. Luke includes their stubborn unbelief because he is recording history, not writing propaganda.

The Power of the Empty Tomb

So, what changed? What transformed these fearful, skeptical men who hid behind locked doors into bold preachers willing to be executed for their faith?

They saw the empty tomb. They witnessed the risen Christ.

In Acts 3, Peter—the same man who thought the women’s report was pure nonsense—stands boldly before a hostile crowd and declares, “You killed the author of life, whom God raised from the dead. To this we are witnesses.”

The resurrection changed them, and it changes us. As the Apostle Paul writes in Ephesians 1, the exact same immeasurable power that God used to raise Christ from the dead is currently at work in those who believe. This is why we can confidently declare alongside the Apostle Paul in Galatians 2:20 that we have been crucified with Christ. Claiming to die with a convicted criminal only makes sense if the tomb is empty. Because He lives, we live by faith in the Son of God who loved us and gave Himself for us.

The Genealogy of Jesus

Summary of my sermon, based on Matthew 1:1-17. Preached at Greenhills Christian Fellowship Toronto on December 1, 2024.

If you’ve never heard the song “Matthew’s Begats” by Andrew Peterson, I highly recommend checking it out. It’s a fun and catchy way to hear the genealogy of Jesus from Matthew 1. I first learned it as a teenager when my youth group performed it in a Christmas cantata, so hearing it now brings back some great memories.

Now, if you compare the song lyrics to the text in Matthew 1:1-17, you might notice a few name variations. For example:

  • Aram (KJV, Greek) = Ram (ESV, NIV, NKJV)
  • Asa (KJV, NKJV, NIV) = Asaph (ESV, Greek)
  • Amon (KJV, NKJV, NIV) = Amos (ESV, Greek)
  • Jehoiachin = Jeconiah (all versions)

These aren’t contradictions, just alternate spellings. But one interesting change in the song is how it refers to Josiah “grandfathering” Jehoiachin, whereas Matthew 1:11 states Josiah was Jehoiachin’s father. The Old Testament timeline confirms that Jehoiachin was actually the son of Jehoiakim (2 Kings 24:6), meaning Matthew skips a generation. This isn’t a mistake—Matthew arranges the genealogy in a structured way, emphasizing Jesus’ place in Jewish history.

Matthew 1:17 explains this:

“So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ fourteen generations.” (ESV)

Matthew isn’t giving a complete genealogy; he’s structuring it to highlight the significance of Jesus’ birth. That’s why many scholars call Matthew “the Gospel for the Jews.”

Each Gospel emphasizes a different aspect of Jesus:

  • Matthew: The Son of David
  • Mark: The Son of Man
  • Luke: The Son of Adam
  • John: The Son of God

Matthew was writing to a Jewish audience, familiar with the Old Testament. He quotes it 54 times—more than any other Gospel. He references Jewish customs without explanation, assuming his readers understand things like fasting, ritual washing, and temple tax. More than any other Gospel, Matthew presents Jesus as the Messiah who fulfills Old Testament prophecies. That’s why he records Jesus saying:

“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.” (Matthew 5:17, ESV)

But here’s the amazing thing—the genealogy of Jesus isn’t just about Jewish history. It also highlights God’s plan to save the whole world.

Consider the five women mentioned: Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba (Uriah’s wife), and Mary. Two of them—Rahab and Ruth—were Gentiles. Bathsheba was married to a Hittite, and all five of these women were associated with scandal in some way.

  • Tamar disguised herself as a prostitute and tricked her father-in-law into sleeping with her (Genesis 38).
  • Rahab was a Canaanite prostitute who helped Israel’s spies in Jericho (Joshua 2).
  • Ruth approached Boaz in a way that, while culturally acceptable, could be seen as scandalous (Ruth 3).
  • Bathsheba committed adultery with King David, leading to devastating consequences (2 Samuel 11).
  • Mary was pregnant before her marriage to Joseph, which would have been scandalous to those who didn’t understand her divine calling (Matthew 1:18-19).

And it’s not just these women—many of the men in Jesus’ lineage were deeply flawed. King David was a man after God’s own heart, but he was also guilty of adultery and murder. Ahaz sacrificed his own son to idols (2 Kings 16:3). Manasseh led Israel into idolatry and child sacrifice (2 Kings 21:6).

Why does this matter? Because Jesus didn’t come from a perfect lineage—He came to save sinners. Paul writes:

“The saying is trustworthy and deserving of full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the foremost.” (1 Timothy 1:15, ESV)

We aren’t saved by our own goodness but by grace:

“For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9, ESV)

And just as Jesus came to save the lost, we are called to share this message with the world:

“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.” (Matthew 28:19-20, ESV)

Jesus’ genealogy is more than a list of names. It’s a testament to God’s grace. No matter our past, Jesus welcomes us into His family.